by Nathan Baney | Feb 20, 2008 | 524, RGM, Rule 4008 |
In re Golman; Case No. 07-12496-RGM; February 20th, 2008 Income and expenses on reaffirmation differed from Schedules I & J without explanation required by Rule 4008. Debtors had the opportunity to be heard, but were not able to explain the difference. ...
by Nathan Baney | Feb 19, 2008 | 524, RGM, Rule 4008 |
In re Senseng; Case No. 07-11165-RGM; February 19th, 2008 No Debtor signature and income and expenses on reaffirmation differed from Schedules I & J without explanation required by Rule 4008. Reaffirmation agreement not...
by Nathan Baney | Feb 11, 2008 | 524, RGM, Rule 4008 |
In re Gonzalez; Case No. 07-11165-RGM; February 11th, 2008 If the agreement shows there to be an undue hardship, and the attorney does not check the box that certifies that despite the undue hardship “the debtor(s) is/are able to make the required payment.” Because...
by Nathan Baney | Jan 17, 2008 | 524, RGM |
In re O’Halloran, Case No. 07-13528-RGM; January 17th, 2008 The debtor has attempted to enter into a reaffirmation agreement, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code §524(c). The court noted that, under that section, paragraph (3) requires that the agreement has been filed with...